Index of /staff/ucacbbl/ftp/papers
This directory contains papers that have been announced on the GP mailing list
but are not available at the GP ftp site at ftp.io.com.  Please look at
the ftp.io.com mirror directory to find any papers that you do not find
here.
Adil Qureshi Aug '95
icga85.txt
==========
 Cramer, Nichael Lynn: "A Representation for the Adaptive Generation of
Simple Sequential Programs", Proceedings, International Conference on
Genetic Algorithms and their Applications, July 1985[CMU], pp183-187.
		  
ABSTRACT
 
 A system for the adaptive generation sequential computer functions is
 described.  A small operator set is defined and encoded in JB, a fixed
 length representation.  After briefly examining the limitations encountered
 in this approach we explore TB, a tree-like representation of the code.
 These representations share the feature that they can be used to represent
 well-formed, useful computer programs while still being amenable to
 suitably defined genetic operators. As a working example, the system is
 used to produce two-input, single-output multiplication functions that are
 concise and well-defined. Future work, dealing with extensions to more
 complicated functions and generalizations of the techniques, is also
 discussed.
94-006.ps.gz
============
Dynamic Training Subset Selection for Supervised Learning in Genetic Programming
Chris Gathercole, Peter Ross
Department of Artificial In telligence
University of Edinburgh 80 South Bridge
Edinburgh EH1 1HN U.K.
chrisg,peterg@aisb.ed.ac.uk
February 25, 1994
Abstract
When using the Genetic Programming (GP) Algorithm on a difficult problem with
a large set of training data, a large population size is needed and a very
large number of function-tree evaluations must be carried out.
This paper describes some efforts made to reduce the number of such evaluations
by concentrating on selecting a small sub-set of the training data set on which
to actually carry out the GP algorithm. Three subset selection methods
described in the paper are: Dynamic Subset Selection (DSS), using the current
GP run to select `difficult' and/or previously , Historical Subset Selection
(HSS), selecting `diffcult' cases from previous GP runs, Random Subset
Selection (RSS) , selecting a subset of cases at random for each generation.
Various runs have shown that GP+DSS can produce better results
in less than 20\045 of the time taken by GP.  GP+HSS can nearly match the
results of GP , and, perhaps surprisingly , GP+RSS can occasionally
approach the results of GP.  GP+DSS produced better, more general results than
those reported in a paper for a variety of Neural Net works when used on
a substantial problem, known as the Thyroid problem.
94-007.ps.gz
============
Applications of genetic algorithms
Peter Ross and Dave Corne
Department of AI, University of Edinburgh
80 South Bridge, Edinburgh EH1 1HN
peter,dave@aisb.ed.ac.uk
Abstract
Genetic algorithms have been applied to a very wide range of practical
problems, often with valuable results.  This paper surveys just a few
examples, to illustrate the diversity of approaches and to point to some
of the considerations that have proved important in making applications
successful.  Because GAs provide a fairly comprehensible way to address
a wide range of difficult engineering and optimisation problems producing
good if not optimal results, it seems that the technology is finding its
way into real-world use much more easily than, say, expert systems did.
University of Edinburgh,
Department of
Artificial Intelligence,
Genetic Algorithms Research Group.
Paper No. 94-007
Submitted for a special issue of the AISB
Quarterly on Evolutionary Computation,
edited by Terry Fogarty
CS-TR-95-1542.ps.gz
===================
John Koza's report on parallelising GP
LearnModels.ps.gz
=================
Learning Mental Models
Astro Teller
Dept of Computer Science
Carnegie Mellon Univeristy
Pittsburgh,
PA 15213
astro@cs.cmu.edu
MentalModels.ps.gz
==================
Chapter 9 of AIGP
PADO-Tech-Report.ps.gz
======================
PADO: Learning Tree Structured Algorithms for Orchestration
into an Object System
Astro Teller and Manuela Veloso
February 10, 1995
School of Computer Science Carnegie
Mellon University Pittsburgh, P A 15213
Abstract
Most artificial intelligence systems work on simple problems and artificial
because they rely on the accurate sensing of the task world. Object recognition
is a crucial part of the sensing challenge and machine learning
stands in a position to catapult object in to real world domains. Given that,
to date, machine learning has not delivered general object recognition, we
propose a different point of attack: the learning architectures
We have developed a method for directly learning and combining algorithms in a
new way that imposes little burden on or bias from the humans involved. This
learning architecture, PADO, and the new results it brings to the problem of
natural image object recognition is the focus of this report.
PADO.ps.gz
==========
PADO: A New Learning Architecture for Object Recognition
Astro Teller and Manuela Veloso
Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
Most artificial intelligence systems to day work on simple problems and
artificial domains because they rely on the accurate sensing of the
task world. Object recognition is a crucial part of the sensing challenge
and machine learning stands in a position to catapult object recognition into
real world domains. Given that, to date, machine learning has not delivered
general object recognition, we propose a different point of the learning
architectures themselves.  We have developed a method for directly learning
and combining algorithms in a new way that imposes little burden on or bias
from the humans involved. This learning architecture, PADO, and the new
results it brings to the problem of natural image object recognition
is the focus of this chapter.
Turing.ps.gz
============
Turing Completeness in the Language of Genetic Programming with Indexed Memory
Astro Teller
Carnegie Mellon University
aisb.ps.gz
==========
Building New Spatial Interaction Models Using Genetic Programming
S. Openshaw and I. Turton,
School of Geography,
University of Leeds,
Leeds,
UK
email: stan@geog.leeds.ac.uk, ian@geog.leeds.ac.uk
Abstract
Building computer models of human geographic systems is difficult because
of the poverty of applicable theory that can be used to specify well formed
and soundly based mathematicalmodels.  As a result there has been little
progress in this area since the late 1960's when mathematical model building
procedures based on entropy-maximising methods were first applied to spatial
interaction data. In the mid-1980's, attention was focused on the use of
genetic algorithms to explore the universe of different models that could be
built from the available symbolic pieces; that is there is a very very large
number of permutations of the model building blocks; viz. a mix of unary and
binary operators, unknown parameters and observed variables, and rules of
syntax for well formed equations. The so-called Automated Modeling System
(AMS) worked but never fulfilled its expectations. The paper revisits
the problem but re-casts the AMS approach into a genetic programming framework.
Some preliminary results based on Cray-YMP runs are reported.
cook94a.ps.gz
=============
Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Research 1 (1994) 231-255 Submitted 12/93; published 2/94
Substructure Discovery Using Minimum Description Length and Background 
Knowledge
Diane J. Cook cook@cse.uta.edu
Lawrence B. Holder holder@cse.uta.edu
Department of Computer Science Engineering
Box 19015 University of Texas at Arlington
Arlington, TX 76019 USA
Abstract
The ability to identify interesting and repetitive substructures
is an essential component to discovering knowledge in structural
data. We describe a new version of our Subdue substructure discovery
system based on the minimum description length principle.
The Subdue system discovers substructures that compress the original data
and represent structural concepts in the data. By replacing previously
discovered substructures in the data, multiple passes of Subdue produce a
hierarchical description of the structural regularities in the data.  Subdue
uses a computationally-bounded inexact graph match that identifies similar,
but not identical, instances of a substructure and finds an approximate
measure of closeness of two substructures when under computational constraints.
In addition to the minimum description length principle, other background
knowledge can be used by Subdue to guide the search towards more appropriate
substructures. Experiments in a variety of domains demonstrate Subdue's
ability to find substructures capable of compressing the original data and to
discover structural concepts important to the domain.
dret_postscript.tar.gz
======================
Artificial-Life Simulators and Their Applications
Howard Gutowitz 
Ecole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles
Laboratoire d'Electronique 
10 rue Vauquelin 
75005 Paris, France 
and 
The Santa Fe Institute 
1399 Hyde Park Road
Santa Fe, NM 87501
hag@santafe.edu 
HTML: http://alife.santafe.edu/alife/topics/simulators/dret/dret.html
Abstract:
Artificial Life (Alife) is a rapidly growing field of scientific research
linking biology and computer science. It seeks to understand how life-like
processes can be embodied in computer programs. Advances in this area
promise to illuminate fundamental questions both in biology ("What is life?")
and in Computer Science ("How to make robust and adaptable computer programs?").
Much of the work in artificial life is directed toward building computer
simulations of artificial creatures and the artificial worlds in which they
live. This report surveys major efforts in this area, with attention to
developments likely to lead to practical applications in the short to middle
term. 
ep.ps.gz
======
Genetic Programming of Music
Jeffrerey B. Putnam
New Mexico Instute of Mining and Technology
Aug 30th '94
model-of-landscapes.ps.gz
=========================
Terry Jones
February 1, 1994
Abstract
The use of the term landscape" is increasing rapidly in the field of
evolutionary computation, yet in many cases it remains poorly,
if at all, defined. This situation has perhaps developed because every one
grasps the imagery immediately, and the questions that would be asked
of a less evocative term do not get asked.  This paper presents a model
of landscapes that is general enough to encompass most of what computer
scientists would call search, though the model is not restricted
to either the field or the viewpoint.  It is particularly relevant to
algorithms that employ some form of crossover, and hence to genetic algorithms
and other members of the evolutionary computing family.  An overview of the
consequences and properties of the model establishes a connection with more
traditional search algorithms from artificial intelligence, introduces
the notion of a crossover landscape, and argues the importance of viewing
search as navigation and structure.
Santa Fe Institute,
1660 Old Pecos Trail, Suite A.,
Santa Fe, NM 87505, USA and Department of
Computer Science, University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque NM 87131, USA.
Email: terry@san tafe.edu
ppsn-94.ps.gz
=============
Program Search with a Hierarchical Variable Length Representation:
Genetic Programming, Simulated Annealing and Hill Climbing
Una-May O`Reilly and Franz Oppacher
Santa Fe Institute,
Santa Fe, NM, 87505, USA
School of Computer Science,
Carleton University, Ottawa, CANADA
Abstract.
This paper presents a comparison of Genetic Programming(GP) with Simulated
Annealing (SA) and Stochastic Iterated Hill Clim bing (SIHC) based on a suite
of program discovery problems which have been previously tackled only with GP.
All three search algorithms employ the hierarchical variable length
representation for programs brough t into recent prominence with the GP
paradigm [8]. We feel it is not intuitively obvious that mutation-based
adaptive search can handle program discovery yet, to date, for each GP problem
we have tried, SA or SIHC also work.
ppsn92.ps.gz
============
An Experimental Perspective on Genetic Programming
Una-May O`Reilly and Franz Oppacher
Intelligent Systems Research Group,
School of Computer Science,
Carleton University, Ottawa,
Ontario, K1S 5B6,
CANADA
Abstract
Genetic Programming (GP) has recently been introduced by John R. Koza [5] as
a method for genetically breeding populations of computer programs to solve
problems.  We believe GP to constitute a significant extension of the Genetic
Algorithm (GA) research paradigm primarily because it generalizes the genetic
search techniques: instead of looking for a solution to a specific instance of
a problem, GP attempts to evolvea program capable of computing the solutions
for any instance of the problem.  We have implemented a genetic programming
environment, GP*, that is capable of duplicating Koza`s experiments.
In this paper we describe a specific GP experimenton the evolution of programs
to sort vectors, and discuss the issues that must be addressed in any
application of GP: the design of fitness functions and test suites, and the
selection of program terminals and functions. Our observations point to
several previously unnoticed shortcomings of the GP approach.  We hypothesize
that these shortcomings are due to the fact that GP only uses a hierarchical
representation but does not construct its solutions in an explicitly
hierarchical manner.
oreilly
=======
Una-May O'Reilly PhD thesis (An Analysis of Genetic Programming)
rosca
=====
Directory containing GP papers by J. P. Rosca ("Learning by Adapting
Representations in GP etc.)
terry
=====
Papers by Terry Jones, including PhD thesis. (Model of Landscapes etc.)
GPdata_icga-95.ps
=================
Evolving Data Structures with Genetic Programming
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
Computer Science Dept.
University College London
It is established good software engineering practice to ensure that
programs use memory via abstract data structures such as stacks,
queues and lists.  These provide an interface between the program and
memory, freeing the program of memory management details which are
left to the data structures to implement.  
The main result presented herein
is that GP can automatically generate stacks and 
queues.
Typically abstract data structures support multiple operations, such as
put and get. We show that GP can simultaneously evolve all the
operations of a data structure by implementing each such operation
with its own independent program tree. That is, the chromosome
consists of a fixed number of independent program trees. Moreover,
crossover only mixes genetic material of program trees that
implement the same operation. Program trees interact with each other
only via shared memory and shared ``Automatically Defined Functions''
(ADFs).
ADFs, ``pass by reference'' when
calling them, Pareto selection, ``good software engineering practice''
and partitioning the genetic population into ``demes''
where also investigated whilst evolving the queue in order to improve the
GP solutions. 
Code is available from this site
WBL_aaai-pppGP.ps
=================       
Pareto Optimality, Population Partitioning, Price's theorem and GP
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
Computer Science Dept.
University College London
A description of a use of Pareto optimality in genetic programming is
given and an analogy with Genetic Algorithm fitness niches is drawn.
Techniques to either spread the population across many pareto optimal
fitness values or to reduce the spread are described. It is speculated
that a wide spread may not aid Genetic Programming. It is suggested
that this might give useful insight into many GPs whose fitness is
composed of several sub-objectives.
The successful use of demic populations in GP leads to speculation
that smaller evolutionary steps might aid GP in the long run.
An example is given where Price's covariance theorem helped when
designing a GP fitness function.
directed_crossover.ps
=====================
Summary of directing crossover locations in a multi-tree GP
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
Computer Science Dept.
University College London
GPlist_aigp2.ps
===============
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
Computer Science Dept.
University College London
Abstract for Advances in Genetic Programming 2
Much published work on genetic programming evolves functions without
``side-effects'' to learn patterns in test data, once produced they
can be used to make predictions regarding new data.  In contrast human
written programs often make extensive and explicit use of memory.
Indeed memory in some form is required for a programming system to be
Turing Complete.  In both normal and genetic programming considerable
benefits have been found in adopting a ``structured approach''. For
example, Koza has shown the introduction of evolvable code modules
(ADFs) can greatly reduce the effort required for GP to reach a
solution.
 
Teller has shown that the introduction of indexed memory into genetic
programming makes it Turing Complete.  This work builds on Teller's
and considers the introduction of data structures within GP.  The
expectation is that the use of data structures will prove as useful to
GP as code structuring has already been shown to be.  So far the
important result is that GP can evolve simple data structures, such as
stacks and queues. This abstract reports the successful evolution a
list data structure, compares the use of Pareto selection and demes
and describes the directed choice of crossover points.
WBL.gpgrid_gp96.ps
==================
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
Computer Science Dept.
University College London
Abstract for: Scheduling Maintenance of Electrical Power Transmission
              Networks Using Genetic Programming
The National Grid Company Plc is responsible for the maintenance of the 
high voltage electricity transmission network in England and Wales.
It must plan maintenance so as to minimize costs taking into account:
 
(1) location and size of demand,
(2) generator capacities and availabilities,
(3) electricity carrying capacity of the remainder of the network,
    that part not undergoing maintenance.
 
Previous work showed the combination of a Genetic Algorithm using an
order or permutation chromosome combined with hand coded ``Greedy''
Optimizers can readily produce an optimal schedule for a four node
test problem. Following this the same GA has been used to find low
cost schedules for the South Wales region of the UK high voltage power
network.
 
This paper describes the evolution of the best known schedule for the
base South Wales problem using Genetic Programming starting from the
hand coded heuristics used with the GA.
Submitted to GP96 late breaking papers
surveyRN76.ps
===============
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
A. Qureshi	A.Qureshi@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Computer Science Dept.
University College London
Genetic Programming -- Computers using "Natural Selection" to generate programs
RN/95/76
Abstract
Computers that ``program themselves''; science fact or fiction?
Genetic Programming uses novel optimisation techniques to ``evolve''
simple programs; mimicking the way humans construct programs by
progressively re-writing them.  Trial programs are repeatedly modified
in the search for ``better/fitter'' solutions. The underlying basis is
Genetic Algorithms (GAs).
 
Genetic Algorithms, pioneered by Holland, Goldberg and others, are
evolutionary search techniques inspired by natural selection (i.e\
survival of the fittest).  GAs work with a ``population'' of trial
solutions to a problem, frequently encoded as strings, and repeatedly
select the ``fitter'' solutions, attempting to evolve better ones. The
power of GAs is being demonstrated for an increasing range of
applications; financial, imaging, VLSI circuit layout, gas pipeline
control and production scheduling.  But one of the most intriguing
uses of GAs - driven by Koza - is automatic program generation.
 
Genetic Programming applies GAs to a ``population'' of programs -
typically encoded as tree-structures.  Trial programs are evaluated
against a ``fitness function'' and the best solutions selected for
modification and re-evaluation. This modification-evaluation cycle is
repeated until a ``correct'' program is produced.  GP has demonstrated
its potential by evolving simple programs for medical signal filters,
classifying news stories, performing optical character recognition,
and for target identification.
 
This paper surveys the exciting field of Genetic Programming.  As a
basis it reviews Genetic Algorithms and automatic program generation.
Next it introduces Genetic Programming, describing its history and
describing the technique via a worked example in C.  Then using a
taxonomy that divides GP researchs into theory/techniques and
applications, it surveys recent work from both of these perspectives.
 
Extensive bibliographies, glossaries and a resource list are included as
appendices.
WBL.ecj.price.125.ps.gz
=======================
Evolution of Genetic Programming Populations
W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
RN/96/125
                 We investigate in detail what happens as genetic
                 programming (GP) populations evolve. Since we shall use
                 the populations which showed GP can evolve stack data
                 structures as examples, we start in Section 1 by
                 briefly describing the stack experiment
                 \cite{Langdon:1995:GPdata}. In Section 2 we show
                 Price's Covariance and Selection Theorem can be applied
                 to Genetic Algorithms (GAs) and GP to predict changes
                 in gene frequencies. We follow the proof of the theorem
                 with experimental justification using the GP runs from
                 the stack problem. Section 3 briefly describes Fisher's
                 Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection and shows in
                 its normal interpretation it does not apply to
                 practical GAs. An analysis of the stack populations, in
                 Section 4, explains that the difficulty of the stack
                 problem is due to the presence of ``deceptive'' high
                 scoring partial solutions in the population. These
                 cause a negative correlation between necessary
                 primitives and fitness. As Price's Theorem predicts,
                 the frequency of necessary primitives falls, eventually
                 leading to their extinction and so to the impossibility
                 of finding solutions like those that are evolved in
                 successful runs. Section 4 investigates the evolution
                 of variety in GP populations. Detailed measurements of
                 the evolution of variety in stack populations reveal
                 loss of diversity causing crossover to produce
                 offspring which are copies of their parents. Section 5
                 concludes with measurements that show in the stack
                 population crossover readily produces improvements in
                 performance initially but later no improvements at all
                 are made by crossover. Section 6 discusses the
                 importance of these results to GP in general
48 pages
bruce.thesis.ps.gz
==================
Wilker Shane Bruce: "The Application of Genetic Programming to the
Automatic Generation of Object-Oriented Programs". Phd Thesis, Dec 1995. 
langdon.ps.gz
=============
W. B. Langdon   W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
Computer Science Dept.
University College London
Abstract
This thesis investigates the evolution and use of abstract data types
within Genetic Programming (GP).  In genetic programming the
principles of natural evolution (fitness based selection and
recombination) acts on program code to automatically generate computer
programs.  The research in this thesis is motivated by the observation
from software engineering that data abstraction (eg via abstract data
types) is essential in programs created by human programmers. We
investigate whether abstract data types can be similarly beneficial to
the automatic production of programs using GP.
GP can automatically ``evolve'' programs which solve non-trivial
problems but few experiments have been reported where the evolved
programs explicitly manipulate memory and yet memory is an essential
component of most computer programs.  So far work on evolving programs
that explicitly use memory has principally used either problem
specific memory models or a simple indexed memory model consisting of
a single global shared array.  Whilst the latter is potentially
sufficient to allow any computation to evolve, it is unstructured and
allows complex interaction between parts of programs which weaken
their modularity.  In software engineering this is addressed by
controlled use of memory using scoping rules and abstract data types,
such as stacks, queues and files.
This thesis makes five main contributions: 
(1) Proving that abstract data types (stacks, queues and lists) can be
evolved using genetic programming.
(2) Demonstrating GP can evolve general programs which recognise a
Dyck context free language, evaluate Reverse Polish expressions and GP
with an appropriate memory structure can solve the nested brackets
problem which had previously been solved using a hybrid GP.
(3) In these three cases (Dyck, expression evaluation and nested
brackets) an appropriate data structure is proved to be beneficial
compared to indexed memory.
(4) Investigations of real world electrical network maintenance
scheduling problems demonstrate that Genetic Algorithms can find low
cost viable solutions to such problems.
(5) A taxonomy of GP is presented, including a critical review of
experiments with evolving memory.  These contributions support our
thesis that data abstraction can be beneficial to automatic program
generation via artificial evolution.
CSRP-97-04.ps.gz
================
Price's Theorem and the MAX Problem
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
We present a detailed analysis of the evolution of GP
populations using the problem of finding a program which
returns the maximum possible value for a given terminal
and function set and a depth limit on the program tree
(known as the MAX problem). We confirm the basic message
of \cite{Gathercole:1996:aicrtd} that crossover together
with program size restrictions can be responsible for
premature convergence to a sub-optimal solution. We show
that this can happen even when the population retains a
high level of variety and show that in many cases
evolution from the sub-optimal solution to the solution is
possible if sufficient time is allowed. In both cases
theoretical models are presented and compared with actual
runs. 
Experimental evidence is presented that Price's Covariance
and Selection Theorem can be applied to GP populations and
the practical effect of program size restrictions are
noted. Finally we show that covariance between gene
frequency and fitness in the first few generations can be
used to predict the course of GP runs.
CSRP-97-09.ps.gz WBL.bloat_wsc2.ps.gz
================ ====================
Fitness Causes Bloat
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
WBL.bloat_wsc2.ps.gz is newer version which appears in WSC2
The problem of evolving an artificial ant to follow the Santa Fe trail is used to
demonstrate the well known genetic programming feature of growth in solution
length. 
Known variously as 
``bloat'', ``redundancy'', ``introns'', ``fluff'', ``Structural Complexity''
with antonyms 
``parsimony'', ``Minimum Description Length'' (MDL) and ``Occam's razor''.
Comparison with runs with and without fitness selection
pressure shows the tendency for solutions to grow in size is caused by
fitness based selection.
We argue that such growth is inherent in using a fixed evaluation
function with a discrete but variable length representation.
Since with simple static evaluation search converges
to mainly finding trial solutions with the same
fitness as existing trial solutions.
In general variable length allows many more long representations of a
given solution than short ones of the same solution.
Thus with an unbiased random search we expect longer representations
to occur more often and so representation length tends to increase.
I.e. fitness based selection leads to bloat.
WBL.max_gp97.ps
===============
An Analysis of the MAX Problem in Genetic Programming
W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
We present a detailed analysis of the evolution of GP populations
using the problem of finding a program which returns the maximum
possible value for a given terminal and function set and a depth limit
on the program tree (known as the MAX problem). We confirm the basic
message of \cite{Gathercole:1996:aicrtd} that crossover together with
program size restrictions can be responsible for premature convergence
to a sub-optimal solution. We show that this can happen even when the
population retains a high level of variety and show that in many cases
evolution from the sub-optimal solution to the solution is possible if
sufficient time is allowed. In both cases theoretical models are
presented and compared with actual runs. Price's Covariance and
Selection Theorem is experimentally tested on GP populations. It is
shown to hold only in some cases, in others program size restrictions
cause important deviation from its predictions.
Considerable update of CSRP-97-04. To appear in GP-97
CSRP-97-14.ps.gz
================
Fitness Causes Bloat in Variable Size Representations
W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
We argue based upon the numbers of representations of given length,
that increase in representation length is inherent in using a fixed
evaluation function with a discrete but variable length
representation. Two examples of this are analysed, including the use of
Price's Theorem. Both examples confirm the tendency for solutions to
grow in size is caused by fitness based selection.
Position paper at "Workshop on Evolutionary Computation with Variable
Size Representation" at ICGA-97, 20 July 1997, East Lansing, MI, USA
CSRP-97-16.ps.gz
================
Fitness Causes Bloat: Mutation
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
In Late Breaking Papers at GP-97 J. Koza (editor)
The problem of evolving, using mutation, an artificial ant to follow
the Santa Fe trail is used to study the well known genetic programming
feature of growth in solution length.  Known variously as ``bloat'',
``fluff'' and increasing ``structural complexity'', this is often
described in terms of increasing ``redundancy'' in the code caused by
``introns''.
Comparison between runs with and without fitness selection pressure,
backed by Price's Theorem, shows the tendency for solutions to grow in
size is caused by fitness based selection.  We argue that such growth
is inherent in using a fixed evaluation function with a discrete but
variable length representation.  With simple static evaluation search
converges to mainly finding trial solutions with the same fitness as
existing trial solutions.  In general variable length allows many more
long representations of a given solution than short ones.  Thus in
search (without a length bias) we expect longer representations to
occur more often and so representation length to tend to increase.
I.e. fitness based selection leads to bloat.
WBL.euro98_bloatm.ps.gz
======================
Fitness Causes Bloat: Mutation
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cwi.nl, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
EuroGP'98
The problem of evolving, using mutation, an artificial ant to follow
the Santa Fe trail is used to study the well known genetic programming
feature of growth in solution length.  Known variously as ``bloat'',
``fluff'' and increasing ``structural complexity'', this is often
described in terms of increasing ``redundancy'' in the code caused by
``introns''.
Comparison between runs with and without fitness selection pressure,
backed by Price's Theorem, shows the tendency for solutions to grow in
size is caused by fitness based selection.  We argue that such growth
is inherent in using a fixed evaluation function with a discrete but
variable length representation.  With simple static evaluation search
converges to mainly finding trial solutions with the same fitness as
existing trial solutions.  In general variable length allows many more
long representations of a given solution than short ones.  Thus in
search (without a length bias) we expect longer representations to
occur more often and so representation length to tend to increase.
I.e. fitness based selection leads to bloat.
WBL.wcci98_bloat.ps.gz
======================
The Evolution of Size in Variable Length Representations
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
ICEC'98
In many cases programs length's increase (known as "bloat", "fluff"
and increasing "structural complexity") during artificial evolution.
We show bloat is not specific to genetic programming and suggest it is
inherent in search techniques with discrete variable length
representations using simple static evaluation functions.  We
investigate the bloating characteristics of three non-population and
one population based search techniques using a novel mutation
operator.
An artificial ant following the Santa Fe trail problem is solved by
simulated annealing, hill climbing, strict hill climbing and
population based search using two variants of the the new subtree
based mutation operator.  As predicted bloat is observed when using
unbiased mutation and is absent in simulated annealing and both hill
climbers when using the length neutral mutation however bloat occurs
with both mutations when using a population.
We conclude that there are two causes of bloat 1) search operators
with no length bias tend to sample bigger trees and 2) competition
within populations favours longer programs as they can usually
reproduce more accurately.
CSRP-97-22.ps.gz
================
Fitness Causes Bloat: Simulated Annealing, Hill Climbing and Populations
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Much extended version of WBL.wcci98_bloat.ps.gz with appendices on
generating random trees and random walks in program space
CSRP-97-26.ps.gz
================
Scheduling Planned Maintenance of Electrical Power Transmission Networks Using Genetic Algorithms
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Summary of Genetic Algorithm and Genetic programming work on evolving
schedules for preventative maintenance of the South Wales region of
the UK high voltage electricity network.
CSRP-97-29.ps.gz
================
Genetic Programming Bloat with Dynamic Fitness
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk and R.Poli@cs.bhan.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Presented at EuroGP-98
In artificial evolution individuals which perform as their parents are
usually rewarded identically to their parents.  We note that Nature is
more dynamic and there may be a penalty to pay for doing the same
thing as your parents.  We report two sets of experiments where static
fitness functions are firstly augmented by a penalty for unchanged
offspring and secondly the static fitness case is replaced by randomly
generated dynamic test cases. We conclude genetic programming, when
evolving artificial ant control programs, is surprisingly little
effected by large penalties and program growth is observed in all our
experiments.
WBL.euro98_bloatd.ps.gz
=======================
Genetic Programming Bloat with Dynamic Fitness
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cwi.nl and R.Poli@cs.bhan.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
EuroGP-98
In artificial evolution individuals which perform as their parents are
usually rewarded identically to their parents.  We note that Nature is
more dynamic and there may be a penalty to pay for doing the same
thing as your parents.  We report two sets of experiments where static
fitness functions are firstly augmented by a penalty for unchanged
offspring and secondly the static fitness case is replaced by randomly
generated dynamic test cases.  We conclude genetic programming, when
evolving artificial ant control programs, is surprisingly little
effected by large penalties and program growth is observed in all our
experiments.
CSRP-98-04.ps.gz
================
Why Ants are Hard
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk and R.Poli@cs.bhan.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Accepted by GP-98
The problem of programming an artificial ant to follow the
Santa Fe trail is used as an example program search space.
Analysis of shorter solutions shows they have many of the
characteristics often ascribed to manually coded programs.
Enumeration of a small fraction of the total search space
and random sampling characterise it as rugged with many
multiple plateaus split by deep valleys and many local and
global optima. This suggests it is difficult for hill
climbing algorithms. Analysis of the program search space
in terms of fixed length schema suggests it is highly
deceptive and that for the simplest solutions large
building blocks must be assembled before they have above
average fitness. In some cases we show solutions cannot be
assembled using a fixed representation from small building
blocks of above average fitness. These suggest the Ant
problem is difficult for Genetic Algorithms.
Random sampling of the program search space suggests on
average the density of global optima changes only slowly
with program size but the density of neutral networks
linking points of the same fitness grows approximately
linearly with program length. This is part of the cause of
bloat.
Previously reported genetic programming, simulated
annealing and hill climbing performance is shown not to be
much better than random search on the Ant problem.
evogprep.ps
===========
Genetic Programming in Europe
Report of the EvoGP Working Group on Genetic Programming of the
European Network of Excellence in Evolutionary Computing
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk and R.Poli@cs.bhan.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
CSRP-98-08.ps.gz (Late breaking paper at 1st European workshop on GP)
================
Better Trained Ants
W. B. Langdon	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
The problem of programming an artificial ant to follow the
Santa~Fe trail has been repeatedly used as a benchmark
problem. Recently we have shown performance of several
techniques is not much better than the best performance
obtainable using uniform random search. We suggested that
this could be because the program fitness landscape is
difficult for hill climbers and the problem is also
difficult for Genetic Algorithms as it contains multiple
levels of deception.
Here we redefine the problem so the ant is obliged to
traverse the trail in approximately the correct order. A
simple genetic programming system, with no size or depth
restriction, is shown to perform approximately three times
better with the improved training function.
CSRP-98-12.ps.gz
================
Better Trained Ants for Genetic Programming
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
Extends CSRP-98-08 by:
requiring the ant to find food quickly,
including the ant's speed in the fitness function, either as a linear
   addition or as a second objective in a multi-objective fitness
   function, 
and GP one point crossover.
WBL.antspace_gp98.ps.gz (GP-98)
=======================
Why Ants are Hard
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
Updated CSRP-98-04.ps.gz
CSRP-98-16.ps.gz (Late breaking paper at GP-98)
================
Boolean Functions Fitness Spaces
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
We investigate the distribution of performance of the Boolean
functions of 3 Boolean inputs (particularly that of the parity
functions), the always-on-6 and even-6 parity functions.  We use
enumeration, uniform Monte-Carlo random sampling and sampling random
full trees.  As expected XOR dramatically changes the fitness
distributions.  In all cases once some minimum size threshold has been
exceeded, the distribution of performance is approximately independent
of program length.  However the distribution of the performance of
full trees is different from that of asymmetric trees and varies with
tree depth.
We consider but reject testing the No Free Lunch (NFL) theorems on
these functions.
CSRP-98-17.ps.gz
================
Why "Building Blocks" Don't Work on Parity Problems
W. B. Langdon and R. Poli	W.B.Langdon@cs.bham.ac.uk, R.Poli@cs.bham.ac.uk
School of Computer Science
University of Birmingham
We investigate the distribution of performance of the parity and
always-on Boolean functions given only the appropriate building
block. These problems have ``needle in a haystack'' fitness landscape
and so are unsuitable for genetic programming or other progressive
search techniques. Theoretical analysis shows in the limit as program
size grows the density of solutions is independent of size but falls
exponentially with number of inputs.
WBL.geccco99.fairxo.ps.gz
=========================
Size Fair and Homologous Tree Genetic Programming Crossovers
W. B. Langdon			W.B.Langdon@cwi.nl
To be presented at GECCO-99: Proceedings of the Genetic and
Evolutionary Computation Conference W. Banzhaf and J. Daida and
A. E. Eiben and M. H. Garzon and V. Honavar and M. Jakiela and
R. E. Smith
Size fair and homologous crossover genetic operators for tree based
genetic programming are described and tested. Both produce
considerably reduced increases in program size and no detrimental
effect on GP performance. GP search spaces are partitioned by the
ridge in the number of program versus their size and depth. A ramped
uniform random initialisation is described which straddles the
ridge. With subtree crossover trees increase about one level per
generation leading to sub-quadratic bloat in length.
cwi_fair.ps.gz
==============
Size Fair and Homologous Tree Crossovers
W. B. Langdon			W.B.Langdon@cwi.nl
CWI technical report expanding on WBL.geccco99.fairxo.ps.gz (23 pages)
c.harris
========
Directory containing Chris Harris' PhD thesis
tinayu
======
Directory containing Tina Yu's PhD thesis
WBL.fitnessspaces.ps.gz
=======================
W. B. Langdon Scaling of Program Tree Fitness Spaces,
in Evolutionary Computation vol 7, no 4
 Name                   Last modified     Size  Description              
 Parent directory
 01-report.pdf          13-Jul-23 20:21   1.5M 
 06S-SIW-089.pdf        27-Oct-06 09:26   141K 
 155-kovacic.pdf        28-Jun-16 13:47   292K 
 94-006.ps.gz           16-Aug-95 18:58    50K 
 94-007.ps.gz           16-Aug-95 19:41    52K 
 acivs01-prog.pdf       09-Feb-14 14:22   316K 
 adil-raja-thesis-2008> 21-Feb-13 18:18   2.9M 
 aisb.ps.gz             16-Aug-95 20:32    37K 
 Akbarzadeh_1997_jce.p> 25-Feb-12 10:18   297K 
 al-madi/               04-Aug-18 14:21      - 
 Anand_thesis.pdf       09-Jan-14 17:27   3.3M 
 Andre_1995_ammsp.pdf   18-Dec-11 15:19   8.5M 
 andre_1995_parallel.p> 18-Dec-11 17:04   6.1M 
 AQ.gp96.600dpi.ps.gz   23-Apr-96 19:21    62K 
 AQ.gp96.ps.gz          23-Apr-96 19:24    82K 
 AQp4.gp96.600dpi.ps.gz 23-Apr-96 19:24    48K 
 Arteaga-Salas_2008_Bi> 27-Oct-07 15:30   239K 
 Astro-ESJ.ps.Z         19-Apr-96 10:23   217K 
 azad_thesis.ps.gz      25-Sep-05 17:09   475K 
 barrett_2005_WSC.pdf   21-Nov-05 17:02   175K 
 Behrooz_PHDThesis_Fin> 03-Feb-14 09:11   3.2M 
 bioratTR.pdf           10-May-11 11:32   166K 
 bohm_1996_eui.pdf      13-Nov-23 08:20   1.6M 
 botzheim/              31-May-11 10:35      - 
 bouras_2025_ssbse.pdf  22-Oct-25 16:47   409K 
 bowtie2_supplementary> 04-Jun-13 10:09    60K 
 brezocnik_2004_AJME.p> 11-May-05 10:26   317K 
 browne/                08-Mar-01 22:26      - 
 bruce.thesis.ps.gz     05-May-96 11:48   469K 
 bruce_bobby_r_thesis.> 16-Jul-18 14:16   2.5M 
 c.harris/              20-Jul-15 15:58      - 
 callan_2024_GI.pdf     26-Jan-24 08:23   640K 
 camda-2008_proceeding> 26-Mar-09 11:55   2.9M 
 CAMDA_JMAS_b.pdf       10-May-11 11:41   2.1M 
 ces-477.pdf            21-Aug-14 16:02    52K 
 chen_1996_cfaGPothers> 04-Feb-12 12:10   8.1M 
 clack_1997_adcb.pdf    04-Aug-05 18:06    87K 
 claire_j_kennedy/      30-Oct-04 13:45      - 
 Con88.pdf              24-Aug-18 19:31   2.4M 
 Connolly_2004_MSDN.pdf 15-Nov-15 11:35   386K 
 cook94a.ps.gz          16-Aug-95 20:32   165K 
 Costelloe_thesis.pdf   03-Apr-12 22:11   945K 
 CS-TR-95-1542.ps.gz    16-Aug-95 20:29   624K 
 csm_470.pdf            21-Aug-14 17:09   899K 
 CSRP-97-04.bib         14-Jan-97 10:41     2K 
 CSRP-97-04.ps.gz       14-Jan-97 10:41    74K 
 CSRP-97-09.bib         10-Jun-97 10:54     2K 
 CSRP-97-09.ps.gz       25-Feb-97 12:50   109K 
 CSRP-97-14.bib         14-May-97 15:25     1K 
 CSRP-97-14.ps.gz       14-May-97 15:25    50K 
 CSRP-97-16.bib         22-May-97 10:22     2K 
 CSRP-97-16.ps.gz       22-May-97 10:22   107K 
 CSRP-97-22.bib         08-Sep-97 14:55     2K 
 CSRP-97-22.ps.gz       08-Sep-97 14:55   121K 
 CSRP-97-26.bib         10-Nov-97 15:51     2K 
 CSRP-97-26.ps.gz       10-Nov-97 15:51   160K 
 CSRP-97-29.bib         08-Dec-97 16:29     1K 
 CSRP-97-29.ps.gz       08-Dec-97 16:29   115K 
 CSRP-98-04.bib         03-Feb-98 15:55     2K 
 CSRP-98-04.ps.gz       03-Feb-98 15:55   171K 
 CSRP-98-08.bib         05-Mar-98 10:00     1K 
 CSRP-98-08.ps.gz       05-Mar-98 10:00    15K 
 csrp-98-10.pdf         19-Jun-06 12:26    32M 
 CSRP-98-12.bib         29-Jun-98 11:55     2K 
 CSRP-98-12.ps.gz       29-Jun-98 11:55    88K 
 CSRP-98-16.bib         15-Jun-98 16:55     1K 
 CSRP-98-16.ps.gz       22-Aug-02 10:29    75K 
 CSRP-98-17.bib         13-Jul-98 15:27     1K 
 CSRP-98-17.ps.gz       13-Jul-98 15:27    53K 
 CSRP-99-03.ps.gz       28-Nov-22 09:48   120K 
 cus_2003_ME.pdf        10-May-05 07:31   637K 
 cwi_fair.ps.gz         12-Apr-99 12:45   125K 
 Dakhama_2023_SSBSE.pdf 04-Oct-23 10:42   362K 
 Dakhama_2025_REACH.pdf 01-Nov-25 12:17   1.1M 
 Dakhama_2025_SSBSE.pdf 11-Oct-25 12:05   1.1M 
 daniel_beck_dissertat> 15-May-14 09:56   1.2M 
 Das_2017_NASAmlw.pdf   22-Dec-19 17:07   139K 
 DavidShaw_Thesis.pdf   23-May-11 12:23   1.6M 
 DBLP_conf_ifip_Kilbur> 26-Jun-20 07:36   2.2M 
 de-la-Cal_2025_SSBSE.> 11-Oct-25 12:02   563K 
 debug_cuda.pdf         02-Jul-11 09:36   191K 
 decaux.masters.pdf     26-Oct-06 17:58   720K 
 decaux.masters.zip     08-Oct-01 14:05   444K 
 deschaine/             13-Nov-14 08:08      - 
 dignum_phdthesis.pdf   11-Feb-21 16:51   1.5M 
 directed_crossover.bib 24-Sep-95 17:50     1K 
 directed_crossover.pdf 16-Aug-06 14:19   118K 
 directed_crossover.ps  23-Apr-96 12:33    63K 
 DPMuni_PHDthesis.pdf   06-Mar-13 09:28   790K 
 dret_postscript.tar.gz 16-Aug-95 20:32   145K 
 dunay_1995_scpga.pdf   18-Dec-11 15:20   6.7M 
 dwimrn0220.pdf         06-Jan-03 19:51    72K 
 dzeroski_1995_dsiml.p> 18-Dec-11 16:27   9.0M 
 edgegp.ps.gz           12-Apr-96 14:23    88K 
 egp2004_pfeiffer.pdf   10-Apr-05 16:34   169K 
 egp2004_pfeiffer.ps.gz 12-Mar-04 17:48    67K 
 ep.ps.gz               16-Aug-95 20:33    49K 
 esparcia-alcazar/      15-May-17 13:45      - 
 etl-tr-93-15.pdf       07-Dec-11 14:21   4.1M 
 etl-tr-93-25.pdf       07-Dec-11 14:29   1.9M 
 Euro2006_Deschaine_Fi> 03-Oct-06 21:06   767K 
 evett_1987_rifs.pdf    10-Nov-11 19:20   2.7M 
 evogprep.pdf           25-Jul-06 10:55   419K 
 evogprep.ps            24-Feb-98 16:46   959K 
 evonews/               09-Feb-14 19:41      - 
 fairxo_bnaic99.ps.gz   22-May-99 14:36    28K 
 feldt_et_al_gecco2000> 21-Nov-11 17:37   164K 
 feldt_et_al_gecco2000> 06-Jul-05 11:53    10M 
 fernandez_1998_nmisrG> 23-Apr-23 18:52   154K 
 fgDissertation.pdf     20-Feb-12 17:38   297K 
 fgPhdDissertation.pdf  24-Feb-12 09:11    17M 
 foga2007_markov.pdf    23-Feb-07 13:21   271K 
 fogp_slides/           05-May-03 09:02      - 
 FULL_THESIS_MRezania2> 31-Mar-12 15:04   3.8M 
 ga95aCona_1995_dGPs.p> 20-Dec-11 11:26    11M 
 ga_beard93a.pdf        06-Dec-11 16:17   674K 
 gecco1999/             12-Nov-12 20:17      - 
 gecco2002/             04-Jan-06 10:48      - 
 GEMS_Article.pdf       27-Oct-06 09:42   186K 
 Georgiou_thesis.pdf    13-Mar-13 10:13   4.2M 
 Geyer-Schulz_1993_EUF> 06-Dec-11 17:11   3.5M 
 Geyer_1990_pfss.pdf    06-Dec-11 17:14   3.2M 
 GeyerSchulz92c.pdf     06-Dec-11 17:09   3.6M 
 GeyerSchulz93b.pdf     06-Dec-11 17:13   3.0M 
 gi2019_discussion.pdf  25-Jun-19 09:54   234K 
 gi2020/                01-Aug-25 07:54      - 
 gi2020_discussion.pdf  31-Jul-20 10:28   386K 
 gi2023_sen.pdf         13-Nov-23 21:09    12M 
 gi2024_sen.pdf         20-Jul-24 13:43    10M 
 gi2025_sen.pdf         18-Aug-25 16:57    13M 
 gi2025_sen_4-jun-2025> 04-Jun-25 09:07    13M 
 glpfinal.ps.gz         03-Jul-02 16:41   180K 
 Gong_2025_SSBSE.pdf    10-Oct-25 16:14   410K 
 gp1996/                24-Jun-15 10:12      - 
 gp1997/                22-Feb-12 19:44      - 
 gp1998/                05-Apr-16 13:23      - 
 gp1998lbp/             05-Apr-16 13:23      - 
 gp96com.ps.gz          12-Apr-96 14:23    10K 
 gp96edge.ps.gz         12-Apr-96 14:23   110K 
 gp_coauthors.pdf       18-Feb-08 17:17   548K 
 GPandIPDpaper1999Hirs> 24-Aug-11 20:25   126K 
 gpcom.ps               12-Apr-96 14:23   2.5M 
 GPdata_icga-95.bib     22-Aug-95 12:38     2K 
 GPdata_icga-95.pdf     17-Aug-06 15:43   199K 
 GPdata_icga-95.ps      22-Aug-95 12:38   297K 
 GPlist_aigp2.ps        22-Aug-95 12:39    64K 
 gppubs10.pdf           03-Jul-10 09:39   688K 
 gppubs20.pdf           20-Nov-21 11:40   779K 
 gppubs5.pdf            12-Mar-05 10:58   181K 
 gppubs5.ps.gz          12-Mar-05 11:01   131K 
 grand_2005.pdf         20-Apr-05 10:21   110K 
 hampo_1992_new.pdf     10-Nov-11 21:44   732K 
 handley_1995_DNAsplic> 18-Dec-11 17:03   3.1M 
 harries.gp97_paper.ps> 24-Apr-97 16:25    60K 
 HengLiu_thesis.pdf     05-Apr-12 20:09   2.4M 
 hinchliffe:Thesis.pdf  18-Mar-05 09:40   1.6M 
 hoai_thesis.tar.gz     14-Jun-06 10:49   4.8M 
 Holzinger_Thesis.pdf   24-Aug-14 16:58   7.0M 
 howard_2003_JDS.pdf    19-Nov-14 18:28   6.1M 
 Iba_1992_mlslsGA.pdf   07-Dec-11 13:53   3.5M 
 Iba_1993_elpbsc.pdf    07-Dec-11 14:10   3.2M 
 Iba_1993_sipsGA.pdf    07-Dec-11 14:39   6.7M 
 Iba_1994_GPlHC.pdf     07-Dec-11 14:43   5.2M 
 iba_1995_nGPsi.pdf     18-Dec-11 16:26   6.7M 
 iba_1995_rtgTR.pdf     07-Dec-11 13:46   7.3M 
 iba_1995_tdpgp.pdf     18-Dec-11 15:20   6.4M 
 icecFinal.ps.gz        11-May-96 14:10   464K 
 icga.pdf               01-Aug-24 09:35    82K 
 icga1985/              28-Sep-24 20:04      - 
 icga1987/              28-Sep-24 20:05      - 
 icga1997/              21-Feb-12 20:01      - 
 icga85.txt             04-Sep-95 13:23    16K 
 icga93_gruau.pdf       07-Dec-11 10:50   2.6M 
 icga93_spencer.pdf     07-Dec-11 16:04   587K 
 icmlde_2018/           13-Feb-19 18:23      - 
 ICSE_SEIP_2025___Sear> 23-Jan-25 08:50   226K 
 igss-workshop_2021.pdf 30-Apr-23 07:08   153K 
 ijspeert/              24-Oct-04 13:31      - 
 Intelligent_perceptua> 16-Aug-06 08:34   1.8M 
 jaws30_reply.pdf       25-Nov-23 13:30   225K 
 Jia_2013_CSBSE.pdf     24-Jun-13 17:58   182K 
 jianjun_hu/            11-Nov-04 14:01      - 
 jmfitz-thesis.pdf      04-Sep-14 17:20   3.0M 
 Kadlic_PhD.pdf         30-Jun-21 08:32   2.1M 
 koza/                  08-Jan-04 13:06      - 
 Krauss_2018_ManLang.p> 05-Aug-18 12:44   1.8M 
 krauss_2020_EuroGP.pdf 28-Feb-20 13:37   497K 
 kusiak_2001_ME.pdf     26-Oct-06 18:30    97K 
 kybernetes_forsyth.pdf 28-Mar-07 15:03   2.1M 
 langdon.bib            13-Jan-97 17:51     3K 
 langdon.ps.gz          13-Jan-97 17:51   803K 
 langdon2024implicitte> 21-Sep-24 09:33   123K 
 langdon_2005_NC.pdf    06-Feb-09 09:57   1.1M 
 langdon_2005_SIS.pdf   22-Oct-05 12:31   828K 
 langdon_2005_SIS.ps.gz 22-Oct-05 12:32   278K 
 langdon_2006_TEC.pdf   25-Feb-07 13:29   1.6M 
 langdon_2007_NC.pdf    02-Nov-11 15:54   2.5M 
 langdon_2008_CIGPU.pdf 23-Jun-08 10:11    73K 
 langdon_2008_CIGPU.ps  23-Jun-08 10:18   131K 
 langdon_2008_CIGPU2.p> 23-Jun-08 10:51   257K 
 langdon_2008_CIGPU2.p> 23-Jun-08 10:51   460K 
 langdon_2008_SC.pdf    26-Jun-08 17:20   559K 
 langdon_2008_SC.ps.gz  26-Jun-08 17:20   471K 
 langdon_2009_CIGPU.pdf 20-Apr-09 19:34   166K 
 langdon_2009_gecco.pdf 19-Apr-09 17:24   153K 
 langdon_2009_gecco2.p> 19-Apr-09 17:27    88K 
 langdon_2009_pdci.pdf  25-Jan-10 14:47   1.1M 
 langdon_2009_TAICPART> 15-Sep-09 18:09   1.5M 
 langdon_2009_TAICPART> 15-Sep-09 18:10   851K 
 langdon_2010_cigpu.pdf 27-Jul-10 11:48   214K 
 langdon_2010_cigpu.ps> 27-Jul-10 11:48    71K 
 langdon_2010_eurogp.p> 20-Apr-10 16:51   260K 
 langdon_2010_eurogp.p> 20-Apr-10 16:51   186K 
 langdon_2010_hbmh.pdf  07-Mar-11 12:42   583K 
 langdon_2011_cla.pdf   21-Oct-11 14:38   110K 
 langdon_2011_foga.pdf  14-Apr-11 16:21   358K 
 langdon_2011_foga.ps.> 14-Apr-11 16:21   213K 
 langdon_2011_gecco.pdf 01-May-11 17:41   117K 
 langdon_2011_gecco.ps> 01-May-11 17:41   117K 
 langdon_2012_evobio.p> 03-Apr-12 13:25   344K 
 Langdon_2012_mendel.p> 04-Jul-12 09:35   174K 
 Langdon_2012_PABA.pdf  20-Sep-12 09:55   307K 
 Langdon_2013_BDM.pdf   08-Dec-14 19:53   1.6M 
 langdon_2013_ecgpu.pdf 05-May-15 13:55   967K 
 Langdon_2013_geccocom> 17-May-13 09:41   1.9M 
 Langdon_2013_GECCOlb.> 08-May-13 18:12   132K 
 Langdon_2013_ieeeTEC.> 05-Feb-15 09:52   460K 
 Langdon_2014_BDM.pdf   27-Jul-15 08:07   165K 
 langdon_2014_EuroGP.p> 07-Feb-14 13:57   225K 
 Langdon_2014_GECCO.pdf 13-Dec-14 10:50   226K 
 langdon_2014_synasc.p> 16-Feb-15 20:12   210K 
 langdon_2014_synasc_a> 03-Sep-14 11:46   154K 
 Langdon_2014_ukmac.pdf 04-Dec-14 18:54   103K 
 langdon_2015_csdc.pdf  29-Dec-16 11:54   544K 
 Langdon_2015_GECCO.pdf 19-Jul-15 16:40   424K 
 langdon_2015_gi_pknot> 19-Jul-15 14:20   213K 
 langdon_2015_hbgpa.pdf 05-Dec-15 13:48   502K 
 Langdon_2015_SSBSE.pdf 16-Aug-15 09:43   276K 
 langdon_2016_cec.pdf   22-Mar-16 18:38   319K 
 langdon_2016_GI.pdf    11-May-16 15:01   107K 
 Langdon_2016_GPEM.pdf  23-Oct-22 19:53   706K 
 langdon_2016_ieeeblog> 08-Feb-16 17:24   619K 
 langdon_2016_IST.pdf   29-Jan-16 10:30    92K 
 Langdon_2016_PPSN.pdf  16-Jun-16 15:13   313K 
 Langdon_2016_PPSNa.pdf 05-Sep-16 16:28   427K 
 Langdon_2016_SSBSE.pdf 03-Sep-16 16:57   635K 
 langdon_2017_ECCSB.pdf 24-Jul-17 13:59   512K 
 langdon_2017_EuroGP.p> 13-Jan-17 15:44   926K 
 Langdon_2017_GECCO.pdf 07-Apr-17 08:07   610K 
 Langdon_2017_GI.pdf    24-Jul-17 15:57   273K 
 langdon_2017_ieeeblog> 09-Jan-17 17:30   293K 
 Langdon_2017_SBST.pdf  24-Feb-17 10:11   120K 
 langdon_2018_EuroGP.p> 25-Mar-18 13:44   1.4M 
 Langdon_2018_SSBSE.pdf 30-Aug-18 13:18   522K 
 Langdon_2019_alife.pdf 10-Aug-19 15:23   669K 
 langdon_2019_EuroGP.p> 13-Apr-19 13:15   415K 
 langdon_2019_GI7.pdf   28-Apr-19 13:09   862K 
 langdon_2019_gpquick.> 25-Apr-19 11:32   430K 
 langdon_2019_ieeeblog> 02-Mar-19 18:47   429K 
 langdon_2019_log2.pdf  29-Mar-19 12:02   459K 
 langdon_2020_ACM.html  28-May-20 10:58     2K  Free Garage Batterys
 langdon_2020_cec.pdf   04-Apr-20 16:29   580K 
 langdon_2020_GI9.pdf   04-May-20 17:20   1.1M 
 langdon_2020_ieeeblog> 25-Mar-20 11:10   364K 
 langdon_2021_EuroGP.p> 26-Mar-21 08:50   1.6M 
 Langdon_2021_GECCO.pdf 14-Jul-21 20:49   726K 
 Langdon_2021_GPTP.pdf  03-Jun-21 13:04   2.2M 
 langdon_2021_ieeeblog> 22-Sep-21 14:48   588K 
 Langdon_2021_LAHS.pdf  16-Jul-21 09:57   8.8M 
 langdon_2021_sigevolu> 24-Oct-21 11:45   852K 
 Langdon_2022_ALJ.pdf   01-Mar-23 19:14   5.6M 
 langdon_2022_complex_> 22-Oct-22 13:39    16M 
 Langdon_2022_EI.pdf    15-Nov-23 12:14   3.5M 
 langdon_2022_GECCO2.p> 14-Apr-22 08:12   1.6M 
 langdon_2022_GECCOcom> 12-Sep-22 08:55   465K 
 langdon_2022_GECCOcom> 04-Apr-22 08:13   1.2M 
 langdon_2022_GECCOhop> 28-Apr-22 18:40   470K 
 langdon_2022_GECCOhop> 29-Apr-22 14:19   452K 
 langdon_2022_prefix2i> 07-Oct-22 15:10   148K 
 langdon_2022_TELO.pdf  03-Sep-22 12:25   3.2M 
 langdon_2023_ACM.html  29-Jun-23 16:00     2K  Too big too understand
 langdon_2023_EuroGP.p> 08-May-23 09:12   754K 
 langdon_2023_GECCO.pdf 08-Sep-23 07:48   450K 
 langdon_2023_GI.pdf    16-May-23 07:23   616K 
 langdon_2024_ASE.pdf   16-Nov-24 08:24   2.8M 
 Langdon_2024_EI.pdf    19-Dec-24 19:06    11M 
 langdon_2024_EuroGP.p> 25-Jan-24 21:39   584K 
 langdon_2024_GI.pdf    13-Feb-24 16:08   745K 
 langdon_2024_sigevolu> 29-Feb-24 18:43   434K 
 Langdon_2025_EuroGP.p> 05-May-25 20:04   386K 
 Langdon_2025_evostarL> 13-Apr-25 14:32   323K 
 langdon_2025_GI.pdf    22-Jul-25 09:10   437K 
 Langdon_2025_IMOL.pdf  19-Jul-25 10:20   2.4M 
 Langdon_2025_UKCI.pdf  12-Jul-25 09:54   442K 
 langdon_amb.pdf        18-Mar-09 18:41   312K 
 langdon_camda2007.pdf  14-Nov-07 10:22   4.9M 
 langdon_camda2007.ps   14-Nov-07 10:22   771K 
 langdon_CUDA_12-oct-2> 10-Oct-09 16:07   1.2M 
 langdon_eurogp_2008.p> 08-Apr-08 14:08   886K 
 langdon_GAPP_KER.pdf   26-Jan-21 14:03   115K 
 langdon_GPEM_gpconv.p> 19-Aug-22 17:08   2.5M 
 langdon_gpu.pdf        19-Aug-11 14:25   343K 
 langdon_gzip_TR-10-02> 05-Feb-10 19:54   259K 
 langdon_in_silico_myc> 12-Feb-20 20:55   657K 
 langdon_jaws30.pdf     25-Nov-23 13:08   438K 
 langdon_jss.pdf        15-Nov-10 10:03   3.9M 
 langdon_ppsn_2008.pdf  18-Nov-08 11:28   256K 
 langdon_ppsn_2008.ps.> 18-Nov-08 11:28   177K 
 langdon_RN2001.pdf     13-Jan-20 19:12   238K 
 langdon_tcbb.pdf       17-Oct-08 13:12   9.0M 
 langdon_tcbb.ps.gz     17-Oct-08 13:12   1.3M 
 Langdon_TELO.pdf       04-Sep-22 09:16   1.4M 
 Langdon_TELO_HOP.pdf   15-Jul-21 21:06   466K 
 LearnModels.ps.gz      16-Aug-95 20:30   782K 
 li_1999_FAGPTFP.pdf    20-Jul-15 19:03   232K 
 LiGao_thesis.pdf       02-Mar-05 21:46   5.2M 
 LoughranThesis.pdf     08-Mar-13 09:15   3.5M 
 Luthi_2007_gecco.pdf   23-Mar-07 10:54   438K 
 Majeed_thesis.pdf      07-Feb-14 19:39   5.3M 
 maq-thesis-14072k1.ps> 14-Jul-01 21:37   396K 
 martijn/               08-Nov-02 19:33      - 
 mcphee_2020_gpem.pdf   06-Apr-20 09:10   336K 
 MentalModels.ps.gz     16-Aug-95 20:31   645K 
 miccio_1995_pGPiBDD.p> 31-Oct-16 19:48   101K 
 MihaKovacicPhD.pdf     20-Jan-13 21:09   2.8M 
 Milgram1967Small.pdf   30-Aug-06 13:47    11M 
 model-of-landscapes.p> 16-Aug-95 16:33    60K 
 moore/                 18-Aug-19 09:16      - 
 Muharram_thesis.pdf    03-Jul-06 13:37   902K 
 nachbar_1995/          06-May-23 08:21      - 
 naidoo_masters.pdf     08-Feb-14 19:04   3.9M 
 natalg93.pdf           02-Aug-23 18:35    94K 
 ncaf_handout.pdf       06-Jul-10 17:44    61K 
 Olson_2016_autoML.pdf  07-Jan-21 21:17   252K 
 oneill/                27-Aug-01 16:21      - 
 oreilly/               29-Oct-95 09:34      - 
 p.chong/               29-Jun-19 11:50      - 
 PADO-Tech-Report.ps.gz 16-Aug-95 20:31   858K 
 PADO.ps.gz             16-Aug-95 20:32   881K 
 page/                  24-Mar-01 09:39      - 
 perform_cuda.pdf       02-Jul-11 09:46   193K 
 Petke_2013_SSBSE.pdf   11-Jun-13 19:48   155K 
 Petke_2017_ieeeTSE.pdf 05-May-17 18:10   2.0M 
 Petke_2021_FSE-IVR.pdf 20-Jul-21 12:20   704K 
 PhD_Thesis_pujol.pdf   21-Nov-12 17:30   7.1M 
 phelps_fogp_review.pdf 12-Nov-15 13:21   2.7M 
 phelps_fogp_review.tex 08-Apr-04 11:00     6K 
 pillay_thesis.pdf      08-Feb-14 19:04   1.7M 
 poli04__tinyg.pdf      08-Nov-15 11:50    57K 
 poli08_fieldguide.azw3 27-Sep-12 10:07   6.1M 
 poli08_fieldguide.epub 20-Sep-12 12:02   5.5M 
 poli08_fieldguide.mob> 20-Sep-12 12:09   5.4M 
 poli08_fieldguide.pdf  17-May-12 11:10   3.6M 
 poli_2006_AIJ.pdf      24-Jul-06 19:45   376K 
 pong_cec2005.pdf       06-Sep-05 11:43   142K 
 pong_cec2005.ps.gz     06-Sep-05 11:44    74K 
 ppsn-94.ps.gz          16-Aug-95 20:35    34K 
 ppsn92.ps.gz           16-Aug-95 20:35    34K 
 price_nature.pdf       02-Oct-06 16:02   2.0M 
 RCS/                   09-Apr-01 11:28      - 
 README                 09-Apr-01 11:25    42K 
 RichSmith_2006_thesis> 20-Aug-06 14:52   728K 
 rn0413.pdf             19-Jul-04 09:42   182K 
 rn0413.ps.gz           19-Jul-04 09:36    59K 
 rn_97_7.pdf            05-Oct-18 13:25   9.4M 
 RNAnet-EMBO2008.pdf    31-Mar-09 11:40   562K 
 rosca/                 16-Aug-95 14:06      - 
 rosca_1995_ml.pdf      18-Dec-11 16:24   1.4M 
 Ruberto_thesis.pdf     22-Apr-21 14:38   1.8M 
 Ryu_Dissertation.pdf   12-Nov-04 10:56   1.5M 
 scase_1999/            14-Dec-16 19:05      - 
 seal2002/              23-Jul-19 09:33      - 
 SEN-R0022.pdf          10-May-11 11:56   184K 
 SEN-R9913.pdf          15-Oct-06 02:53   840K 
 senet.ps.gz            27-Feb-96 12:21    37K 
 SIGEVOlution_vol13_is> 23-May-20 12:36   295K 
 sims/                  16-Jan-12 11:11      - 
 singleton_byte.pdf     24-Mar-16 10:24   110K 
 Sohn_thesis.pdf        14-Nov-21 17:01   5.6M 
 SPLASH_SRC_Krauss_Oli> 05-Aug-18 12:33   459K 
 sterling_1998_bccc_hp> 12-Jul-23 10:22   535K 
 stewart_1995_juggling> 18-Dec-11 16:29   4.1M 
 surveyRN76.bib         02-Oct-95 19:43     3K 
 surveyRN76.pdf         09-Jul-03 10:00   385K 
 surveyRN76.ps          09-Jul-03 10:07   656K 
 tanomaru_1996_tm.pdf   04-Feb-12 12:09   7.6M 
 teller_1995_db.pdf     18-Dec-11 16:28   8.9M 
 TellerVelosoEPIA.ps.gz 11-May-96 14:01   807K 
 terry/                 21-Aug-95 16:33      - 
 tesi_vanneschi.pdf     11-Jan-05 11:54    18M 
 these_lassabe.pdf      04-Aug-14 12:04   4.7M 
 Thesis_Fan_v2.1.pdf    02-Jul-17 13:34   1.2M 
 Thesis_Final_Cry.pdf   15-May-21 21:23    12M 
 Thesis_jyu.pdf         11-May-14 17:50   4.0M 
 Thesis_KIALA.pdf       08-Dec-20 13:04   3.4M 
 tinayu/                04-Aug-16 11:39      - 
 tr-09-02.pdf           19-Mar-09 10:58   270K 
 tr-09-05.pdf           24-Jun-09 09:32   142K 
 tr-csm-442.pdf         12-Dec-05 15:34    91K 
 trenaman/              27-Aug-01 16:19      - 
 TsangCEE2001.pdf       27-Oct-06 09:17   155K 
 TunstelPhD.pdf         24-Feb-12 17:14   882K 
 TunstelPhD.ps.gz       24-Feb-12 17:13   466K 
 Turing.ps.gz           16-Aug-95 20:32   382K 
 vladislavleva_2008_th> 04-Jan-15 19:33   5.2M 
 WBL.aigp2.appx.pdf     07-Feb-04 15:08   115K 
 WBL.aigp2.appx.ps.gz   27-Oct-01 16:37    52K 
 WBL.aigp2.ch20.bib     18-Dec-95 12:30     1K 
 WBL.aigp2.ch20.ps      18-Dec-95 11:56   214K 
 WBL.antspace_gp98.bib  27-Feb-06 14:22     2K 
 WBL.antspace_gp98.bib~ 07-Apr-98 18:49     2K 
 WBL.antspace_gp98.pdf  27-Feb-06 14:16   413K 
 WBL.antspace_gp98.ps.> 27-Feb-06 14:16   221K 
 WBL.benelearn1.99.ps.> 29-Oct-99 10:47    40K 
 WBL.benelearn2.99.pdf  27-Jul-06 20:31   150K 
 WBL.bloat_wsc2.ps.gz   03-Jan-01 11:21    81K 
 WBL.dynbloat.egp98.bib 31-Jan-98 12:54     1K 
 WBL.ecj.price.125.bib  18-Jan-97 14:42     3K 
 WBL.ecj.price.125.pdf  15-Aug-06 21:05   638K 
 WBL.ecj.price.125.ps.> 07-Jan-97 16:31   212K 
 WBL.euro98_bloatd.pdf  31-Jul-06 10:24   859K 
 WBL.euro98_bloatd.ps.> 09-Nov-99 16:36   104K 
 WBL.euro98_bloatm.pdf  27-Jul-06 18:51   189K 
 WBL.euro98_bloatm.ps.> 09-Nov-99 15:32    65K 
 WBL.fitnessspaces.bib  29-Nov-99 19:39     2K 
 WBL.fitnessspaces.pdf  03-Aug-06 20:33   543K 
 WBL.fitnessspaces.ps.> 29-Nov-99 19:27   211K 
 WBL.gecco2000.quad.ps> 15-Mar-00 15:47   122K 
 WBL.gecco99.fairxo.bib 09-Apr-01 11:21     2K 
 WBL.gecco99.fairxo.bi> 26-Oct-99 09:28     2K 
 WBL.gecco99.fairxo.ps> 26-Oct-99 09:47    61K 
 WBL.gp96.bib           02-Apr-96 17:24     3K 
 WBL.gp96.ps            10-Jul-96 10:34   132K 
 WBL.gp96.submitted.ps  08-Jan-96 13:59   122K 
 WBL.gpgrid_gp96.bib    28-Jun-96 19:11     2K 
 WBL.gpgrid_gp96.ps     07-Jul-96 13:42   245K 
 WBL.max_gp97.bib       19-Mar-97 16:51     2K 
 WBL.max_gp97.pdf       25-Jul-06 13:06   245K 
 WBL.max_gp97.ps        25-Jul-06 13:07   386K 
 WBL.mutbloat.egp98.bib 31-Jan-98 13:21     1K 
 WBL.wcci98_bloat.bib   27-Jan-98 11:54     2K 
 WBL.wcci98_bloat.pdf   14-Aug-06 17:48   447K 
 WBL.wcci98_bloat.ps.gz 27-Jan-98 11:21    45K 
 WBL_aaai-pppGP.bib     22-Aug-95 12:39     1K 
 WBL_aaai-pppGP.pdf     16-Aug-06 19:11   185K 
 WBL_aaai-pppGP.ps      22-Aug-95 12:39   239K 
 wbl_bioavail.pdf       12-Dec-04 19:09   324K 
 wbl_bioavail.ps.gz     12-Dec-04 19:11   103K 
 wbl_bnaic2002.pdf      30-Aug-02 10:04   156K 
 wbl_bnaic2002.ps.gz    30-Aug-02 10:21    44K 
 wbl_bnaic2005.pdf      19-Oct-05 14:55   169K 
 wbl_bnaic2005.ps.gz    19-Oct-05 14:57   105K 
 wbl_bnvki_stud99.ps.gz 15-Sep-99 18:11    24K 
 wbl_cec2003.pdf        12-Jan-04 17:44   186K 
 wbl_cec2003.ps.gz      12-Jan-04 17:44    57K 
 wbl_cec2005.pdf        30-Aug-05 13:22   272K 
 wbl_cec2005.ps.gz      30-Aug-05 13:25    93K 
 wbl_cec2006.pdf        22-Mar-06 13:40   486K 
 wbl_cec2006.ps.gz      22-Mar-06 13:40   194K 
 wbl_dnachip.pdf        09-Aug-21 19:15   217K 
 wbl_dnachip.ps.gz      14-Jun-04 15:59    57K 
 wbl_egp1999.ps.gz      22-Aug-02 09:30   102K 
 wbl_egp2001.ps.gz      05-Mar-01 16:17    59K 
 wbl_egp2002.pdf        02-Jan-06 18:08   193K 
 wbl_egp2002.ps.gz      02-Jan-06 18:22   126K 
 wbl_egp2005.pdf        14-Jan-05 13:49   678K 
 wbl_egp2005.ps.gz      14-Jan-05 13:51   365K 
 wbl_egp2006.pdf        13-May-06 19:10   284K 
 wbl_egp2006.ps.gz      13-May-06 19:10   162K 
 wbl_egp2006_old.pdf    03-Jan-06 11:31   283K 
 wbl_egp2006_old.ps.gz  17-Jan-06 13:06   161K 
 WBL_eurogp2000_seed.p> 15-Jul-06 15:27   517K 
 WBL_eurogp2000_seed.p> 27-Feb-00 12:23   195K 
 wbl_evo_indent.pdf     25-Mar-09 15:39   206K 
 wbl_evobio2003.pdf     11-Apr-04 19:26   224K 
 wbl_evobio2003.ps.gz   07-Apr-03 10:39    68K 
 WBL_fairxo.pdf         07-May-01 13:39   329K 
 WBL_fairxo.ps.gz       07-May-01 12:41   129K 
 wbl_foga2002.pdf       11-Jan-03 12:46   241K 
 wbl_foga2002.pdf. Pub> 11-Jan-03 12:46   241K 
 wbl_foga2002.ps.gz     11-Jan-03 12:55    84K 
 WBL_gecco2001_roc.pdf  09-Apr-01 19:45   271K 
 WBL_gecco2001_roc.ps.> 29-Mar-01 15:13    95K 
 wbl_gecco2002.pdf      28-May-02 11:05   204K 
 wbl_gecco2002.ps.gz    28-May-02 11:10    73K 
 wbl_gecco2002lb.pdf    28-May-02 10:38   201K 
 wbl_gecco2002lb.ps.gz  28-May-02 09:45    76K 
 wbl_gecco2003.pdf      30-Mar-03 18:08   220K 
 wbl_gecco2003.ps.gz    30-Mar-03 18:23    72K 
 wbl_gecco2004lb.pdf    25-May-04 15:15   237K 
 wbl_gecco2004lb.ps.gz  25-May-04 15:16    78K 
 WBL_gppubs.pdf         08-Oct-99 08:15   114K 
 WBL_gppubs.ps.gz       07-Oct-99 19:01    41K 
 wbl_handeye.ps.gz      05-Mar-01 16:09   593K 
 wbl_his02_slides.pdf   27-Nov-02 20:39   284K 
 wbl_iee_gpgrid.pdf     10-Sep-05 15:48   171K 
 wbl_iee_gpgrid.prn.gz  10-Feb-02 11:38   309K 
 wbl_kdmdd2002.pdf      16-Oct-02 20:37   131K 
 wbl_mcs2001.pdf        13-Jul-06 13:19   124K 
 wbl_mcs2001.ps.gz      11-Jan-02 17:01    63K 
 wbl_metas2005.pdf      24-May-05 10:07   179K 
 wbl_ppsn2000.pdf       13-Jul-06 14:20   290K 
 wbl_ppsn2000.ps.gz     11-Jan-02 16:42    82K 
 wbl_rais_igr.pdf       28-Nov-03 12:03   118K 
 wbl_repeat_linear.pdf  22-Oct-05 12:05   424K 
 wbl_repeat_linear.ps.> 22-Oct-05 12:07   215K 
 wbl_reversible.pdf     24-Nov-03 18:41   277K 
 wbl_reversible.pdf.    24-Nov-03 18:41   277K 
 wbl_reversible.ps.gz   24-Nov-03 18:41    96K 
 wbl_rn0306.pdf         29-Oct-03 17:14    77K 
 wbl_rn0306.ps          29-Oct-03 17:15    73K 
 wbl_scale_prog_func.p> 11-Feb-09 12:05   407K 
 wbl_uc2002.pdf         03-Jun-06 16:14   347K 
 wbl_uc2002.ps.gz       03-Jun-06 16:14   178K 
 WBL_wsc6.pdf           24-Apr-03 11:48   199K 
 whigham_1996_phd.pdf   05-Sep-22 12:07   1.3M 
 Wyvern_February_08.pdf 10-May-11 14:46   2.1M 
 yada-thesis-sect3.3.p> 11-Nov-12 20:50   157K 
 yin_2008_WSSEC.pdf     05-Aug-18 07:58   352K 
 yuehui.chen/           30-Jul-01 09:34      - 
 zhang_1995_bimdl.pdf   18-Dec-11 16:25   3.0M 
 zojaji_thesis.pdf      20-Sep-22 16:21   6.1M 
522 files