A Comparison of Voxel Compression Mapping and Longitudinal Voxel-Based Morphometry

Gerard Ridgway (1), Rachael Scahill (2), Derek Hill (1), Nick Fox (2)

  1. Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London
  2. Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, UCL, UK

Poster PDF

Supplementary Material

References

Smoothness & modulation notes

Results figures

Alzheimer's Disease vs Control

G
Glass brain MIP (uncorrected, FDR-corrected in poster)
F
FDR corrected blobs overlaid on average normalised baseline brain
U
Uncorrected forward and reverse contrast blobs
R
Raw t-value overlays

At six months:

Method VCM ISN TSN AVG
M G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R
U G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R

At twelve months:

Method VCM ISN TSN AVG
M G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R
U G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R G, F, U, R

Mixed AD and Control vs balanced mix

G
Glass brain MIP (uncorrected, nothing survives FDR correction at 0.01)
R
Raw t-value overlays

At six months:

Method VCM ISN TSN AVG
M G, R G, R G, R G, R
U G, R G, R G, R G, R

At twelve months:

Method VCM ISN TSN AVG
M G, R G, R G, R G, R
U G, R G, R G, R G, R

Ged Ridgway, GRidgway@cs.ucl, +44 (0) 20 7679 0218

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!