Validation of volume-preserving non-rigid registration: Application to contrast-Enhanced MR-mammography


Initial validation studies have been conducted to compare the single- and multi-level registration strategies [9] and to assess the usefulness of a volume-preservation constraint [10].

METHOD

Three images pairs, where no motion was visible between pre- and post-contrast image, were selected from a large database. For each patient, four deformations were generated and target registration errors were determined as described in [7].

RESULTS

(a) (b)
(c) (d) Figure 1: Target registration error (TRE) after simulation, rigid registration and multi-resolution non-rigid registration with control point spacing of 20mm, 20mm->10mm and 20mm->10mm->5mm. TRE was evaluated over (a,b) the whole breast tissue and (c,d) the region of the enhancing lesion for (a,c) the unconstrained non-rigid registration and (b,d) the volume-preserving non-rigid registration. The graph shows the mean and standard deviation of TRE for three patients and four deformations. (from [10])

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the volume preserving non-rigid registration was more accurate than the unconstrained method. Severe local deformations were better compensated by finer control point spacing. However, the contrast enhancing lesions were more accurately aligned at a control point spacing of 20mm.

References:


Last modified: Sun Feb 9 12:50:44 GMT 2003